Header Logo

Connection

Laura Frishman to Humans

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Laura Frishman has written about Humans.
Connection Strength

0.591
  1. Multifocal visual evoked potentials and contrast sensitivity correlate with ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness in multiple sclerosis. Clin Neurophysiol. 2019 01; 130(1):180-188.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  2. ISCEV extended protocol for the photopic negative response (PhNR) of the full-field electroretinogram. Doc Ophthalmol. 2018 Jun; 136(3):207-211.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  3. Longitudinal Evaluation of Visual Function in Multiple Sclerosis. Optom Vis Sci. 2015 Oct; 92(10):976-85.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  4. Reproducibility of multifocal visual evoked potential and traditional visual evoked potential in normal and multiple sclerosis eyes. Doc Ophthalmol. 2015 Feb; 130(1):31-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  5. Tracking changes over time in retinal nerve fiber layer and ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2014 Sep; 20(10):1331-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  6. The photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram in multiple sclerosis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Mar; 53(3):1315-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  7. Comparison of multifocal visual evoked potential, standard automated perimetry and optical coherence tomography in assessing visual pathway in multiple sclerosis patients. Mult Scler. 2010 Apr; 16(4):412-26.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  8. Assessing visual pathway function in multiple sclerosis patients with multifocal visual evoked potentials. Mult Scler. 2009 Dec; 15(12):1431-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  9. The effect of eccentricity on the contrast response function of multifocal visual evoked potentials (mfVEPs). Vision Res. 2009 Jul; 49(14):1711-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  10. The relationship between visual field and retinal nerve fiber layer measurements in patients with multiple sclerosis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007 Dec; 48(12):5798-805.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  11. Effects of Spectral Characteristics of Ganzfeld Stimuli on the Photopic Negative Response (PhNR) of the ERG. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007 Oct; 48(10):4818-28.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  12. Effect of experimental glaucoma in primates on oscillatory potentials of the slow-sequence mfERG. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006 Feb; 47(2):753-67.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  13. Sampling and interpolation of the a-wave of the electroretinogram. Doc Ophthalmol. 2004 May; 108(3):171-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  14. Regional variations in local contributions to the primate photopic flash ERG: revealed using the slow-sequence mfERG. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003 Jul; 44(7):3233-47.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  15. ISCEV Standard for full-field clinical electroretinography (2022 update). Doc Ophthalmol. 2022 06; 144(3):165-177.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  16. Custom Optical Coherence Tomography Parameters for Distinguishing Papilledema from Pseudopapilledema. Optom Vis Sci. 2019 08; 96(8):599-608.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  17. Use of A-scan Ultrasound and Optical Coherence Tomography to Differentiate Papilledema From Pseudopapilledema. Optom Vis Sci. 2017 12; 94(12):1081-1089.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  18. ISCEV Standard for clinical electro-oculography (2017 update). Doc Ophthalmol. 2017 02; 134(1):1-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  19. Photopic ERGs in patients with optic neuropathies: comparison with primate ERGs after pharmacologic blockade of inner retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004 Oct; 45(10):3827-37.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  20. Visual field defects and neural losses from experimental glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2002 Jan; 21(1):91-125.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.