Header Logo

Connection

Raymond Applegate to Refraction, Ocular

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Raymond Applegate has written about Refraction, Ocular.
Connection Strength

2.735
  1. Is an objective refraction optimised using the visual Strehl ratio better than a subjective refraction? Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2017 05; 37(3):317-325.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.490
  2. Template-based correction of high-order aberration in keratoconus. Optom Vis Sci. 2013 Apr; 90(4):324-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.372
  3. Change in visual acuity is highly correlated with change in six image quality metrics independent of wavefront error and/or pupil diameter. J Vis. 2012 Sep 14; 12(10):11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.358
  4. Uncorrected wavefront error and visual performance during RGP wear in keratoconus. Optom Vis Sci. 2007 Jun; 84(6):463-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.248
  5. Influence of exposure time and pupil size on a Shack-Hartmann metric of forward scatter. J Refract Surg. 2005 Sep-Oct; 21(5):S547-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.220
  6. Metrics of optical quality derived from wave aberrations predict visual performance. J Vis. 2004 Apr 23; 4(4):322-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.200
  7. Allowable movement of wavefront-guided contact lens corrections in normal and keratoconic eyes. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2024 Jun; 44(4):746-756.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.198
  8. Assessing the visual image quality provided by refractive corrections during keratoconus progression. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2022 03; 42(2):358-366.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.170
  9. Modeling refractive correction strategies in keratoconus. J Vis. 2021 09 01; 21(10):18.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.167
  10. Change in visual acuity is well correlated with change in image-quality metrics for both normal and keratoconic wavefront errors. J Vis. 2013 Nov 26; 13(13):28.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.097
  11. Utilising a visual image quality metric to optimise spectacle prescriptions for eyes with keratoconus. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2023 09; 43(5):1007-1015.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  12. Clinical applications of personalising the neural components of visual image quality metrics for individual eyes. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2022 03; 42(2):272-282.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  13. The Impact of Misaligned Wavefront-guided Correction in a Scleral Lens for the Highly Aberrated Eye. Optom Vis Sci. 2020 09; 97(9):732-740.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  14. Alignment of a wavefront-guided scleral lens correction in the presence of a lens capsulotomy. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2020 12; 43(6):613-616.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  15. Do Polymer Coatings Change the Aberrations of Conventional and Wavefront-guided Scleral Lenses? Optom Vis Sci. 2020 01; 97(1):28-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  16. A population study on changes in wave aberrations with accommodation. J Vis. 2004 Apr 16; 4(4):272-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.