Header Logo

Connection

Raymond Applegate to Retina

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Raymond Applegate has written about Retina.
Connection Strength

1.571
  1. Optimizing wavefront-guided corrections for highly aberrated eyes in the presence of registration uncertainty. J Vis. 2013 Jun 11; 13(7).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.370
  2. Importance of fixation, pupil center, and reference axis in ocular wavefront sensing, videokeratography, and retinal image quality. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Jan; 35(1):139-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.272
  3. Dynamic simulation of the effect of soft toric contact lenses movement on retinal image quality. Optom Vis Sci. 2008 Apr; 85(4):230-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.258
  4. Metrics of retinal image quality predict visual performance in eyes with 20/17 or better visual acuity. Optom Vis Sci. 2006 Sep; 83(9):635-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.231
  5. Registration tolerance of a custom correction to maintain visual acuity. Optom Vis Sci. 2013 Dec; 90(12):1370-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.095
  6. Factors accounting for the 4-year change in acuity in patients between 50 and 80 years. Optom Vis Sci. 2013 Jul; 90(7):620-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.093
  7. Six just-noticeable differences in retinal image quality in 1 line of visual acuity: toward quantification of happy versus unhappy patients with 20/20 acuity. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Aug; 37(8):1523-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.081
  8. Noise in wavefront error measurement from pupil center location uncertainty. J Refract Surg. 2010 Oct; 26(10):796-802.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.077
  9. Glenn Fry award lecture 2002: wavefront sensing, ideal corrections, and visual performance. Optom Vis Sci. 2004 Mar; 81(3):167-77.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  10. Interaction between aberrations to improve or reduce visual performance. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003 Aug; 29(8):1487-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.