Raymond Applegate to Male
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Raymond Applegate has written about Male.
Connection Strength
0.592
-
Allowable movement of wavefront-guided contact lens corrections in normal and keratoconic eyes. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2024 Jun; 44(4):746-756.
Score: 0.116
-
Is an objective refraction optimised using the visual Strehl ratio better than a subjective refraction? Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2017 05; 37(3):317-325.
Score: 0.072
-
A Comparison of Three Methods to Increase Scleral Contact Lens On-Eye Stability. Eye Contact Lens. 2015 Nov; 41(6):386-90.
Score: 0.065
-
Wavefront-guided scleral lens correction in keratoconus. Optom Vis Sci. 2014 Oct; 91(10):1221-30.
Score: 0.061
-
Change in visual acuity is well correlated with change in image-quality metrics for both normal and keratoconic wavefront errors. J Vis. 2013 Nov 26; 13(13):28.
Score: 0.057
-
Factors accounting for the 4-year change in acuity in patients between 50 and 80 years. Optom Vis Sci. 2013 Jul; 90(7):620-7.
Score: 0.056
-
Importance of fixation, pupil center, and reference axis in ocular wavefront sensing, videokeratography, and retinal image quality. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Jan; 35(1):139-52.
Score: 0.041
-
Three-dimensional relationship between high-order root-mean-square wavefront error, pupil diameter, and aging. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2007 Mar; 24(3):578-87.
Score: 0.036
-
Case Report: What Are We Doing for Our "20/20 Unhappy" Scleral Lens Patients? Optom Vis Sci. 2020 09; 97(9):826-830.
Score: 0.023
-
The Impact of Misaligned Wavefront-guided Correction in a Scleral Lens for the Highly Aberrated Eye. Optom Vis Sci. 2020 09; 97(9):732-740.
Score: 0.023
-
Do Polymer Coatings Change the Aberrations of Conventional and Wavefront-guided Scleral Lenses? Optom Vis Sci. 2020 01; 97(1):28-35.
Score: 0.022
-
Comparison of Wavefront-guided and Best Conventional Scleral Lenses after Habituation in Eyes with Corneal Ectasia. Optom Vis Sci. 2019 04; 96(4):238-247.
Score: 0.021