Header Logo

Connection

Harold Bedell to Male

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Harold Bedell has written about Male.
Connection Strength

1.404
  1. High- and Low-contrast Letter Acuity during Image Motion in Normal Observers and Observers with Infantile Nystagmus Syndrome. Optom Vis Sci. 2021 02 01; 98(2):150-158.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.094
  2. Upturn of the contour-interaction function at small flanking bar-to-target separations. Vision Res. 2020 02; 167:1-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.087
  3. Contrast Energy and Contour Interaction. Optom Vis Sci. 2019 12; 96(12):940-947.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.087
  4. Reading speed of patients with infantile nystagmus for text in different orientations. Vision Res. 2019 02; 155:17-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.082
  5. Impact of simulated micro-scotomas on reading performance in central and peripheral retina. Exp Eye Res. 2019 06; 183:9-19.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.079
  6. Functional changes at the preferred retinal locus in subjects with bilateral central vision loss. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018 Jan; 256(1):29-37.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.075
  7. Scotoma Visibility and Reading Rate with Bilateral Central Scotomas. Optom Vis Sci. 2017 03; 94(3):279-289.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.072
  8. Repeatability of Nidek MP-1 Fixation Measurements in Patients With Bilateral Central Field Loss. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015 Apr; 56(4):2624-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.063
  9. Evidence for an eye-movement contribution to normal foveal crowding. Optom Vis Sci. 2015 Feb; 92(2):237-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  10. Large crowding zones in peripheral vision for briefly presented stimuli. J Vis. 2014 Dec 30; 14(6):11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  11. Fixation locus in patients with bilateral central scotomas for targets that perceptually fill in. Optom Vis Sci. 2014 Mar; 91(3):312-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  12. Foveal contour interaction on the edge: response to 'Letter-to-the-Editor' by Drs. Coates and Levi. Vision Res. 2014 Mar; 96:145-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  13. Contour interaction for foveal acuity targets at different luminances. Vision Res. 2013 Aug 30; 89:90-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  14. Motion deblurring during pursuit tracking improves spatial-interval acuity. Vision Res. 2013 Apr 05; 81:6-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  15. Vertical heterophoria and susceptibility to visually induced motion sickness. Strabismus. 2012 Mar; 20(1):17-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  16. D(max) for stereoscopic depth perception with simulated monovision correction. Seeing Perceiving. 2012; 25(5):399-408.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  17. Transfer of perceptual learning of depth discrimination between local and global stereograms. Vision Res. 2010 Aug 23; 50(18):1891-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  18. Orientation discrimination with macular changes associated with early AMD. Optom Vis Sci. 2009 May; 86(5):485-91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  19. The perceived visual direction of monocular objects in random-dot stereograms is influenced by perceived depth and allelotropia. Vision Res. 2009 Jan; 49(2):190-201.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  20. Beating the beat: reading can be faster than the frequency of eye movements in persons with congenital nystagmus. Optom Vis Sci. 2006 Aug; 83(8):559-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  21. Technical Report: The Mechanism of Contour Interaction Differs in the Fovea and Periphery. Optom Vis Sci. 2020 12; 97(12):1053-1060.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  22. The Associations among Metamorphopsia, Orientation Discrimination Threshold, and Retinal Layer Thickness in Patients with Idiopathic Epiretinal Membrane. Curr Eye Res. 2018 09; 43(9):1151-1159.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  23. Contour interaction under photopic and scotopic conditions. J Vis. 2018 06 01; 18(6):5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  24. The influence of endogenous attention on contrast perception, contrast discrimination, and saccadic reaction time. Vision Res. 2018 02; 143:89-102.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  25. Relationships of orientation discrimination threshold and visual acuity with macular lesions in age-related macular degeneration. PLoS One. 2017; 12(9):e0185070.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  26. The reference frame for encoding and retention of motion depends on stimulus set size. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 Apr; 79(3):888-910.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  27. Change in visual acuity is well correlated with change in image-quality metrics for both normal and keratoconic wavefront errors. J Vis. 2013 Nov 26; 13(13):28.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  28. Pooling signals from vertically and non-vertically orientation-tuned disparity mechanisms in human stereopsis. Vision Res. 2006 Jan; 46(1-2):1-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  29. Near stereothresholds measured with random-dot stereograms using phase disparities. Optometry. 2003 Jul; 74(7):453-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  30. Stereopsis is perturbed by vergence error. Vision Res. 2003 Jan; 43(2):181-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.