Header Logo

Connection

Jason Marsack to Visual Acuity

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Jason Marsack has written about Visual Acuity.
Jason Marsack
Connection Strength
4.501
Visual Acuity
  1. Case Report: What Are We Doing for Our "20/20 Unhappy" Scleral Lens Patients? Optom Vis Sci. 2020 09; 97(9):826-830.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.594
  2. Visual interaction of 2nd to 5th order Zernike aberration terms with vertical coma. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2020 09; 40(5):669-679.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.592
  3. Performance of wavefront-guided soft lenses in three keratoconus subjects. Optom Vis Sci. 2008 Dec; 85(12):E1172-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.263
  4. Uncorrected wavefront error and visual performance during RGP wear in keratoconus. Optom Vis Sci. 2007 Jun; 84(6):463-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.237
  5. Comparison of Unaided and Aided Visual Acuity in Adults With Down Syndrome. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2025 Jan 02; 14(1):30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.201
  6. Metrics of optical quality derived from wave aberrations predict visual performance. J Vis. 2004 Apr 23; 4(4):322-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.191
  7. Utilising a visual image quality metric to optimise spectacle prescriptions for eyes with keratoconus. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2023 09; 43(5):1007-1015.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.179
  8. Clinical applications of personalising the neural components of visual image quality metrics for individual eyes. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2022 03; 42(2):272-282.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.163
  9. Orientation-specific long-term neural adaptation of the visual system in keratoconus. Vision Res. 2021 01; 178:100-111.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.151
  10. Quantifying the Optical and Physical Consequences of Daily Cleaning on Conventional and Wavefront-guided Scleral Lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2020 09; 97(9):754-760.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.149
  11. The Impact of Misaligned Wavefront-guided Correction in a Scleral Lens for the Highly Aberrated Eye. Optom Vis Sci. 2020 09; 97(9):732-740.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.149
  12. Alignment of a wavefront-guided scleral lens correction in the presence of a lens capsulotomy. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2020 12; 43(6):613-616.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.144
  13. Do Polymer Coatings Change the Aberrations of Conventional and Wavefront-guided Scleral Lenses? Optom Vis Sci. 2020 01; 97(1):28-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.142
  14. Comparison of Wavefront-guided and Best Conventional Scleral Lenses after Habituation in Eyes with Corneal Ectasia. Optom Vis Sci. 2019 04; 96(4):238-247.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.135
  15. Repeatability of Monocular Acuity Testing in Adults with and without Down Syndrome. Optom Vis Sci. 2018 03; 95(3):202-211.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.125
  16. Objective measurement of spectacle wear with a temperature sensor data logger. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018 01; 38(1):37-47.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.122
  17. Is an objective refraction optimised using the visual Strehl ratio better than a subjective refraction? Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2017 05; 37(3):317-325.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.117
  18. Wavefront-guided scleral lens correction in keratoconus. Optom Vis Sci. 2014 Oct; 91(10):1221-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.099
  19. Change in visual acuity is well correlated with change in image-quality metrics for both normal and keratoconic wavefront errors. J Vis. 2013 Nov 26; 13(13):28.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.093
  20. Controlled induction of spherical aberration with custom soft contact lenses. Clin Exp Optom. 2009 May; 92(3):283-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.067
  21. On-eye performance of custom wavefront-guided soft contact lenses in a habitual soft lens-wearing keratoconic patient. J Refract Surg. 2007 Nov; 23(9):960-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  22. Metrics of retinal image quality predict visual performance in eyes with 20/17 or better visual acuity. Optom Vis Sci. 2006 Sep; 83(9):635-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  23. Impact of Zernike-fit error on simulated high- and low-contrast acuity in keratoconus: implications for using Zernike-based corrections. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2006 Apr; 23(4):769-76.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  24. Measuring visual acuity--mesopic or photopic conditions, and high or low contrast letters? J Refract Surg. 2004 Sep-Oct; 20(5):S508-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  25. Visual Acuity Prediction Based on Different Refraction Types For Patients With Down Syndrome. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2023 09 01; 12(9):11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  26. Interaction between aberrations to improve or reduce visual performance. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003 Aug; 29(8):1487-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  27. Case Report: When Two Is Worse Than One-Stereo Imbalance in a Case of Wavefront-guided Scleral Lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2023 05 01; 100(5):299-303.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  28. Visual Acuity Outcomes in a Randomized Trial of Wavefront Metric-optimized Refractions in Adults with Down Syndrome. Optom Vis Sci. 2022 01 01; 99(1):58-66.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  29. Modeling refractive correction strategies in keratoconus. J Vis. 2021 09 01; 21(10):18.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  30. A Randomized Trial of Objective Spectacle Prescriptions for Adults with Down Syndrome: Baseline Data and Methods. Optom Vis Sci. 2021 01 01; 98(1):88-99.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  31. Understanding the Impact of Individual Perceived Image Quality Features on Visual Performance. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2020 04; 9(5):7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  32. A Comparison of Three Methods to Increase Scleral Contact Lens On-Eye Stability. Eye Contact Lens. 2015 Nov; 41(6):386-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  33. Optimizing wavefront-guided corrections for highly aberrated eyes in the presence of registration uncertainty. J Vis. 2013 Jun 11; 13(7).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  34. Dynamic simulation of the effect of soft toric contact lenses movement on retinal image quality. Optom Vis Sci. 2008 Apr; 85(4):230-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  35. Quantifying scatter in Shack-Hartmann images to evaluate nuclear cataract. J Refract Surg. 2004 Sep-Oct; 20(5):S515-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.