Header Logo

Connection

Han Cheng to Adult

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Han Cheng has written about Adult.
Han Cheng
Connection Strength
0.615
Adult
  1. Evaluation of the SpotChecks contrast sensitivity test in healthy adults. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2024 Sep; 44(6):1072-1083.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.139
  2. Effects of head-down tilt on optic nerve sheath diameter in healthy subjects. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2023 Nov; 43(6):1531-1539.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.130
  3. The relationship between visual field and retinal nerve fiber layer measurements in patients with multiple sclerosis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007 Dec; 48(12):5798-805.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  4. A population study on changes in wave aberrations with accommodation. J Vis. 2004 Apr 16; 4(4):272-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  5. Comparing the CamBlobs2 contrast sensitivity test to the near Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity test in normally-sighted young adults. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2021 09; 41(5):1125-1133.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  6. Optic Nerve Head Morphological Changes Over 12 Hours in Seated and Head-Down Tilt Postures. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2020 11 02; 61(13):21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  7. Custom Optical Coherence Tomography Parameters for Distinguishing Papilledema from Pseudopapilledema. Optom Vis Sci. 2019 08; 96(8):599-608.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  8. Multifocal visual evoked potentials and contrast sensitivity correlate with ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness in multiple sclerosis. Clin Neurophysiol. 2019 01; 130(1):180-188.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  9. Use of A-scan Ultrasound and Optical Coherence Tomography to Differentiate Papilledema From Pseudopapilledema. Optom Vis Sci. 2017 12; 94(12):1081-1089.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  10. Is an objective refraction optimised using the visual Strehl ratio better than a subjective refraction? Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2017 05; 37(3):317-325.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  11. Longitudinal Evaluation of Visual Function in Multiple Sclerosis. Optom Vis Sci. 2015 Oct; 92(10):976-85.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  12. Reproducibility of multifocal visual evoked potential and traditional visual evoked potential in normal and multiple sclerosis eyes. Doc Ophthalmol. 2015 Feb; 130(1):31-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  13. Tracking changes over time in retinal nerve fiber layer and ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2014 Sep; 20(10):1331-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  14. The photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram in multiple sclerosis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Mar; 53(3):1315-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  15. Comparison of optical coherence tomography and scanning laser polarimetry measurements in patients with multiple sclerosis. Optom Vis Sci. 2010 Aug; 87(8):576-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  16. Comparison of multifocal visual evoked potential, standard automated perimetry and optical coherence tomography in assessing visual pathway in multiple sclerosis patients. Mult Scler. 2010 Apr; 16(4):412-26.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  17. Assessing visual pathway function in multiple sclerosis patients with multifocal visual evoked potentials. Mult Scler. 2009 Dec; 15(12):1431-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  18. The effect of eccentricity on the contrast response function of multifocal visual evoked potentials (mfVEPs). Vision Res. 2009 Jul; 49(14):1711-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.