Raymond Applegate to Visual Acuity
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Raymond Applegate has written about Visual Acuity.
Connection Strength
5.856
-
Allowable movement of wavefront-guided contact lens corrections in normal and keratoconic eyes. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2024 Jun; 44(4):746-756.
Score: 0.756
-
Is an objective refraction optimised using the visual Strehl ratio better than a subjective refraction? Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2017 05; 37(3):317-325.
Score: 0.469
-
Change in visual acuity is well correlated with change in image-quality metrics for both normal and keratoconic wavefront errors. J Vis. 2013 Nov 26; 13(13):28.
Score: 0.372
-
Factors accounting for the 4-year change in acuity in patients between 50 and 80 years. Optom Vis Sci. 2013 Jul; 90(7):620-7.
Score: 0.362
-
Change in visual acuity is highly correlated with change in six image quality metrics independent of wavefront error and/or pupil diameter. J Vis. 2012 Sep 14; 12(10):11.
Score: 0.342
-
Controlled induction of spherical aberration with custom soft contact lenses. Clin Exp Optom. 2009 May; 92(3):283-8.
Score: 0.269
-
Performance of wavefront-guided soft lenses in three keratoconus subjects. Optom Vis Sci. 2008 Dec; 85(12):E1172-8.
Score: 0.263
-
Uncorrected wavefront error and visual performance during RGP wear in keratoconus. Optom Vis Sci. 2007 Jun; 84(6):463-70.
Score: 0.237
-
Metrics of retinal image quality predict visual performance in eyes with 20/17 or better visual acuity. Optom Vis Sci. 2006 Sep; 83(9):635-40.
Score: 0.225
-
Measuring visual acuity--mesopic or photopic conditions, and high or low contrast letters? J Refract Surg. 2004 Sep-Oct; 20(5):S508-14.
Score: 0.196
-
Metrics of optical quality derived from wave aberrations predict visual performance. J Vis. 2004 Apr 23; 4(4):322-8.
Score: 0.191
-
Interaction between aberrations to improve or reduce visual performance. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003 Aug; 29(8):1487-95.
Score: 0.182
-
Visual acuity as a function of Zernike mode and level of root mean square error. Optom Vis Sci. 2003 Feb; 80(2):97-105.
Score: 0.176
-
Influence of rigid lens decentration and rotation on visual image quality in normal and keratoconic eyes. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2022 11; 42(6):1204-1213.
Score: 0.171
-
Are all aberrations equal? J Refract Surg. 2002 Sep-Oct; 18(5):S556-62.
Score: 0.171
-
Assessing the visual image quality provided by refractive corrections during keratoconus progression. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2022 03; 42(2):358-366.
Score: 0.162
-
Modeling refractive correction strategies in keratoconus. J Vis. 2021 09 01; 21(10):18.
Score: 0.159
-
Case Report: What Are We Doing for Our "20/20 Unhappy" Scleral Lens Patients? Optom Vis Sci. 2020 09; 97(9):826-830.
Score: 0.149
-
A Comparison of Three Methods to Increase Scleral Contact Lens On-Eye Stability. Eye Contact Lens. 2015 Nov; 41(6):386-90.
Score: 0.106
-
Wavefront-guided scleral lens correction in keratoconus. Optom Vis Sci. 2014 Oct; 91(10):1221-30.
Score: 0.099
-
Registration tolerance of a custom correction to maintain visual acuity. Optom Vis Sci. 2013 Dec; 90(12):1370-84.
Score: 0.093
-
Optimizing wavefront-guided corrections for highly aberrated eyes in the presence of registration uncertainty. J Vis. 2013 Jun 11; 13(7).
Score: 0.090
-
Six just-noticeable differences in retinal image quality in 1 line of visual acuity: toward quantification of happy versus unhappy patients with 20/20 acuity. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Aug; 37(8):1523-9.
Score: 0.079
-
Dynamic simulation of the effect of soft toric contact lenses movement on retinal image quality. Optom Vis Sci. 2008 Apr; 85(4):230-5.
Score: 0.063
-
On-eye performance of custom wavefront-guided soft contact lenses in a habitual soft lens-wearing keratoconic patient. J Refract Surg. 2007 Nov; 23(9):960-4.
Score: 0.061
-
Impact of Zernike-fit error on simulated high- and low-contrast acuity in keratoconus: implications for using Zernike-based corrections. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2006 Apr; 23(4):769-76.
Score: 0.055
-
Quantifying scatter in Shack-Hartmann images to evaluate nuclear cataract. J Refract Surg. 2004 Sep-Oct; 20(5):S515-22.
Score: 0.049
-
Utilising a visual image quality metric to optimise spectacle prescriptions for eyes with keratoconus. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2023 09; 43(5):1007-1015.
Score: 0.045
-
Case Report: When Two Is Worse Than One-Stereo Imbalance in a Case of Wavefront-guided Scleral Lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2023 05 01; 100(5):299-303.
Score: 0.044
-
Clinical applications of personalising the neural components of visual image quality metrics for individual eyes. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2022 03; 42(2):272-282.
Score: 0.041
-
Orientation-specific long-term neural adaptation of the visual system in keratoconus. Vision Res. 2021 01; 178:100-111.
Score: 0.038
-
The Impact of Misaligned Wavefront-guided Correction in a Scleral Lens for the Highly Aberrated Eye. Optom Vis Sci. 2020 09; 97(9):732-740.
Score: 0.037
-
Alignment of a wavefront-guided scleral lens correction in the presence of a lens capsulotomy. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2020 12; 43(6):613-616.
Score: 0.036
-
Do Polymer Coatings Change the Aberrations of Conventional and Wavefront-guided Scleral Lenses? Optom Vis Sci. 2020 01; 97(1):28-35.
Score: 0.035
-
Comparison of Wavefront-guided and Best Conventional Scleral Lenses after Habituation in Eyes with Corneal Ectasia. Optom Vis Sci. 2019 04; 96(4):238-247.
Score: 0.034