Header Logo

Connection

Ricardo Azevedo to Biological Evolution

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Ricardo Azevedo has written about Biological Evolution.
Connection Strength

3.765
  1. Genetic drift promotes and recombination hinders speciation on holey fitness landscapes. PLoS Genet. 2024 Jan; 20(1):e1011126.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.882
  2. A branching process model of evolutionary rescue. Math Biosci. 2021 11; 341:108708.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.750
  3. Genetic architecture and the evolution of sex. J Hered. 2010 Mar-Apr; 101 Suppl 1:S142-57.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.337
  4. Networking networks. Evol Dev. 2008 Sep-Oct; 10(5):514-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.303
  5. A generative bias towards average complexity in artificial cell lineages. Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Jul 22; 274(1619):1741-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.281
  6. Sexual reproduction selects for robustness and negative epistasis in artificial gene networks. Nature. 2006 Mar 02; 440(7080):87-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.255
  7. The simplicity of metazoan cell lineages. Nature. 2005 Jan 13; 433(7022):152-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.236
  8. Historical Contingency Causes Divergence in Adaptive Expression of the lac Operon. Mol Biol Evol. 2021 06 25; 38(7):2869-2879.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.184
  9. Population structure promotes the evolution of costly sex in artificial gene networks. Evolution. 2019 06; 73(6):1089-1100.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.159
  10. The Evolution of Small-RNA-Mediated Silencing of an Invading Transposable Element. Genome Biol Evol. 2018 11 01; 10(11):3038-3057.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.153
  11. Spiraling Complexity: A Test of the Snowball Effect in a Computational Model of RNA Folding. Genetics. 2017 05; 206(1):377-388.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.135
  12. Sex ratio evolution under probabilistic sex determination. Evolution. 2011 Jul; 65(7):2050-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.090
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.