Header Logo

Connection

Harold Bedell to Humans

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Harold Bedell has written about Humans.
Connection Strength

1.995
  1. High- and Low-contrast Letter Acuity during Image Motion in Normal Observers and Observers with Infantile Nystagmus Syndrome. Optom Vis Sci. 2021 02 01; 98(2):150-158.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.071
  2. A Comparison of Foveal and Peripheral Contour Interaction and Crowding. Optom Vis Sci. 2021 01 01; 98(1):41-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.070
  3. Upturn of the contour-interaction function at small flanking bar-to-target separations. Vision Res. 2020 02; 167:1-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.065
  4. Contrast Energy and Contour Interaction. Optom Vis Sci. 2019 12; 96(12):940-947.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.065
  5. Reading speed of patients with infantile nystagmus for text in different orientations. Vision Res. 2019 02; 155:17-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  6. Impact of simulated micro-scotomas on reading performance in central and peripheral retina. Exp Eye Res. 2019 06; 183:9-19.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  7. Functional changes at the preferred retinal locus in subjects with bilateral central vision loss. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018 Jan; 256(1):29-37.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  8. Scotoma Visibility and Reading Rate with Bilateral Central Scotomas. Optom Vis Sci. 2017 03; 94(3):279-289.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  9. Repeatability of Nidek MP-1 Fixation Measurements in Patients With Bilateral Central Field Loss. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015 Apr; 56(4):2624-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  10. Evidence for an eye-movement contribution to normal foveal crowding. Optom Vis Sci. 2015 Feb; 92(2):237-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  11. Large crowding zones in peripheral vision for briefly presented stimuli. J Vis. 2014 Dec 30; 14(6):11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  12. Visual-function tests for self-monitoring of age-related macular degeneration. Optom Vis Sci. 2014 Aug; 91(8):956-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  13. Fixation locus in patients with bilateral central scotomas for targets that perceptually fill in. Optom Vis Sci. 2014 Mar; 91(3):312-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  14. Foveal contour interaction on the edge: response to 'Letter-to-the-Editor' by Drs. Coates and Levi. Vision Res. 2014 Mar; 96:145-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  15. Registration tolerance of a custom correction to maintain visual acuity. Optom Vis Sci. 2013 Dec; 90(12):1370-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  16. Contour interaction for foveal acuity targets at different luminances. Vision Res. 2013 Aug 30; 89:90-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  17. Motion deblurring during pursuit tracking improves spatial-interval acuity. Vision Res. 2013 Apr 05; 81:6-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  18. Eye movement testing in clinical examination. Vision Res. 2013 Sep 20; 90:32-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  19. Changes in perceived egocentric direction during symmetric vergence. Perception. 2013; 42(2):127-37.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  20. Spatial-bisection acuity in infantile nystagmus. Vision Res. 2012 Jul 01; 64:1-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  21. Binocular retinal image differences influence eye-position signals for perceived visual direction. Vision Res. 2012 Jun 01; 62:220-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  22. Vertical heterophoria and susceptibility to visually induced motion sickness. Strabismus. 2012 Mar; 20(1):17-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  23. D(max) for stereoscopic depth perception with simulated monovision correction. Seeing Perceiving. 2012; 25(5):399-408.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  24. Six just-noticeable differences in retinal image quality in 1 line of visual acuity: toward quantification of happy versus unhappy patients with 20/20 acuity. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Aug; 37(8):1523-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  25. Relative contributions of the two eyes to perceived egocentric visual direction in normal binocular vision. Vision Res. 2011 May 11; 51(9):1075-85.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  26. The perception of motion smear during eye and head movements. Vision Res. 2010 Dec; 50(24):2692-701.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  27. Transfer of perceptual learning of depth discrimination between local and global stereograms. Vision Res. 2010 Aug 23; 50(18):1891-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  28. The temporal impulse response function during smooth pursuit. Vision Res. 2009 Nov; 49(23):2835-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  29. Orientation discrimination with macular changes associated with early AMD. Optom Vis Sci. 2009 May; 86(5):485-91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  30. Asymmetrical perception of motion smear in infantile nystagmus. Vision Res. 2009 Jan; 49(2):262-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  31. The perceived visual direction of monocular objects in random-dot stereograms is influenced by perceived depth and allelotropia. Vision Res. 2009 Jan; 49(2):190-201.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  32. Signals of eye-muscle proprioception modulate perceived motion smear. J Vis. 2008 Oct 23; 8(14):7.1-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  33. Motion sensitivity during fixation in straight-ahead and lateral eccentric gaze. Exp Brain Res. 2008 Sep; 190(2):189-200.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  34. The temporal impulse response function in infantile nystagmus. Vision Res. 2008 Jul; 48(15):1575-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  35. Direction and extent of perceived motion smear during pursuit eye movement. Vision Res. 2007 Mar; 47(7):1011-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  36. Direction-of-motion discrimination is facilitated by visible motion smear. Percept Psychophys. 2007 Jan; 69(1):48-55.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  37. The attenuation of perceived motion smear during combined eye and head movements. Vision Res. 2006 Dec; 46(26):4387-97.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  38. Beating the beat: reading can be faster than the frequency of eye movements in persons with congenital nystagmus. Optom Vis Sci. 2006 Aug; 83(8):559-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  39. Visual and perceptual consequences of congenital nystagmus. Semin Ophthalmol. 2006 Apr-Jun; 21(2):91-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  40. Asymmetrical vertical phorias in normal subjects: the influence of unbalanced illumination. Strabismus. 2005 Sep; 13(3):123-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  41. Attenuation of perceived motion smear during the vestibulo-ocular reflex. Vision Res. 2005 Jul; 45(16):2191-200.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  42. Asymmetry of perceived motion smear during head and eye movements: evidence for a dichotomous neural categorization of retinal image motion. Vision Res. 2005 Jun; 45(12):1519-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  43. Attenuation of perceived motion smear during vergence and pursuit tracking. Vision Res. 2004 Apr; 44(9):895-902.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  44. Suprathreshold intrinsic dynamics of the human visual system. Neural Comput. 2003 Dec; 15(12):2883-908.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  45. Color and motion: which is the tortoise and which is the hare? Vision Res. 2003 Oct; 43(23):2403-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  46. Velocity dependence of Vernier and letter acuity for band-pass filtered moving stimuli. Vision Res. 2003 Mar; 43(6):669-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  47. Characteristics of saccades during the near point of convergence test. Vision Res. 2021 10; 187:27-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  48. Technical Report: The Mechanism of Contour Interaction Differs in the Fovea and Periphery. Optom Vis Sci. 2020 12; 97(12):1053-1060.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  49. Number of flankers influences foveal crowding and contour interaction differently. Vision Res. 2021 02; 179:9-18.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  50. The Associations among Metamorphopsia, Orientation Discrimination Threshold, and Retinal Layer Thickness in Patients with Idiopathic Epiretinal Membrane. Curr Eye Res. 2018 09; 43(9):1151-1159.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  51. Contour interaction under photopic and scotopic conditions. J Vis. 2018 06 01; 18(6):5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  52. The influence of endogenous attention on contrast perception, contrast discrimination, and saccadic reaction time. Vision Res. 2018 02; 143:89-102.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  53. Relationships of orientation discrimination threshold and visual acuity with macular lesions in age-related macular degeneration. PLoS One. 2017; 12(9):e0185070.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  54. The reference frame for encoding and retention of motion depends on stimulus set size. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 Apr; 79(3):888-910.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  55. Bottlenecks of motion processing during a visual glance: the leaky flask model. PLoS One. 2013; 8(12):e83671.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  56. Change in visual acuity is well correlated with change in image-quality metrics for both normal and keratoconic wavefront errors. J Vis. 2013 Nov 26; 13(13):28.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  57. Optimizing wavefront-guided corrections for highly aberrated eyes in the presence of registration uncertainty. J Vis. 2013 Jun 11; 13(7).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  58. High-capacity, transient retention of direction-of-motion information for multiple moving objects. J Vis. 2010 Jun 01; 10(6):8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  59. Spatial and temporal properties of the illusory motion-induced position shift for drifting stimuli. Vision Res. 2007 Jan; 47(2):231-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  60. Pooling signals from vertically and non-vertically orientation-tuned disparity mechanisms in human stereopsis. Vision Res. 2006 Jan; 46(1-2):1-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  61. Stereothresholds for moving line stimuli for a range of velocities. Vision Res. 2005 Mar; 45(6):789-99.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  62. Differential latencies and the dynamics of the position computation process for moving targets, assessed with the flash-lag effect. Vision Res. 2004; 44(18):2109-28.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  63. Stereoscopic depth perception from oblique phase disparities. Vision Res. 2003 Nov; 43(24):2479-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  64. Near stereothresholds measured with random-dot stereograms using phase disparities. Optometry. 2003 Jul; 74(7):453-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  65. Stereopsis is perturbed by vergence error. Vision Res. 2003 Jan; 43(2):181-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  66. Stereothresholds with simulated vergence variability and constant error. Vision Res. 2003 Jan; 43(2):195-204.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  67. Orientation discrimination and variability of torsional eye position in congenital nystagmus. Vision Res. 2002 Sep; 42(20):2395-407.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  68. Effect of exposure duration, contrast and base blur on coding and discrimination of edges. Spat Vis. 2002; 15(3):341-76.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.