Header Logo

Connection

Jan Bergmanson to Humans

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Jan Bergmanson has written about Humans.
Connection Strength

0.770
  1. Central versus peripheral thickness in the human cornea explained. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2024 Jun; 47(3):102165.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.088
  2. Central versus peripheral corneal thickness - A White spot on the corneal (anatomy) map. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2021 Aug; 44(4):101473.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.072
  3. Size does matter: what is the corneo-limbal diameter? Clin Exp Optom. 2017 Sep; 100(5):522-528.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  4. Assessing Scleral Contact Lens Satisfaction in a Keratoconus Population. Optom Vis Sci. 2016 08; 93(8):855-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  5. Scleral gas permeable lenses have come of age. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2016 Aug; 39(4):247-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  6. Lamellar changes in the keratoconic cornea. Acta Ophthalmol. 2015 Dec; 93(8):767-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  7. Scleral contact lenses and hypoxia: Theory versus practice. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2015 Jun; 38(3):145-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  8. Recurrence or re-emergence of keratoconus--what is the evidence telling us? Literature review and two case reports. Ocul Surf. 2014 Oct; 12(4):267-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  9. Morphology of contact lens-induced conjunctival epithelial flaps: a pilot study. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2012 Aug; 35(4):185-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  10. Quantified histopathology of the keratoconic cornea. Optom Vis Sci. 2011 Aug; 88(8):988-97.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  11. In vitro effects of medium tonicity, nutrient concentration, and free chlorine content on Acanthamoeba. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2011 Aug; 34(4):164-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  12. Acute corneal hydrops: a case report including confocal and histopathological considerations. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2006 May; 29(2):69-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  13. Assessment of the number of lamellae in the central region of the normal human corneal stroma at the resolution of the transmission electron microscope. Eye Contact Lens. 2005 Nov; 31(6):281-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  14. The diagnosis and characteristics of moderate dry eye in non-contact lens wearers. Eye Contact Lens. 2005 May; 31(3):96-104.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  15. Reverse-geometry gas-permeable lens design for pellucid marginal degeneration. Eye Contact Lens. 2005 May; 31(3):127-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  16. A comparison of tear volume (by tear meniscus height and phenol red thread test) and tear fluid osmolality measures in non-lens wearers and in contact lens wearers. Eye Contact Lens. 2004 Jul; 30(3):132-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  17. The association of bulbar conjunctival folds with other clinical findings in normal and moderate dry eye subjects. Optometry. 2003 Sep; 74(9):576-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  18. CLEAR - Anatomy and physiology of the anterior eye. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2021 Apr; 44(2):132-156.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  19. A measure of tear inflow in habitual scleral lens wearers with and without midday fogging. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2019 02; 42(1):36-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  20. Complications and fitting challenges associated with scleral contact lenses: A review. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2016 Apr; 39(2):88-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  21. Fine structure of the interface between the anterior limiting lamina and the anterior stromal fibrils of the human cornea. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008 Sep; 49(9):3914-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  22. Opaque contact lens color choices among women of different ethnic groups. Eye Contact Lens. 2003 Apr; 29(2):93-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.