Header Logo

Connection

Jason Marsack to Refraction, Ocular

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Jason Marsack has written about Refraction, Ocular.
Jason Marsack
Connection Strength
3.305
Refraction, Ocular
  1. Visual interaction of 2nd to 5th order Zernike aberration terms with vertical coma. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2020 09; 40(5):669-679.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.619
  2. Variability in Objective Refraction for Persons with Down Syndrome. Optom Vis Sci. 2017 05; 94(5):574-581.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.493
  3. Template-based correction of high-order aberration in keratoconus. Optom Vis Sci. 2013 Apr; 90(4):324-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.372
  4. Uncorrected wavefront error and visual performance during RGP wear in keratoconus. Optom Vis Sci. 2007 Jun; 84(6):463-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.248
  5. Metrics of optical quality derived from wave aberrations predict visual performance. J Vis. 2004 Apr 23; 4(4):322-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.200
  6. Utilising a visual image quality metric to optimise spectacle prescriptions for eyes with keratoconus. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2023 09; 43(5):1007-1015.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.188
  7. Clinical applications of personalising the neural components of visual image quality metrics for individual eyes. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2022 03; 42(2):272-282.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.171
  8. The Impact of Misaligned Wavefront-guided Correction in a Scleral Lens for the Highly Aberrated Eye. Optom Vis Sci. 2020 09; 97(9):732-740.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.155
  9. Alignment of a wavefront-guided scleral lens correction in the presence of a lens capsulotomy. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2020 12; 43(6):613-616.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.150
  10. Do Polymer Coatings Change the Aberrations of Conventional and Wavefront-guided Scleral Lenses? Optom Vis Sci. 2020 01; 97(1):28-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.148
  11. Objective measurement of spectacle wear with a temperature sensor data logger. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018 01; 38(1):37-47.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.128
  12. Is an objective refraction optimised using the visual Strehl ratio better than a subjective refraction? Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2017 05; 37(3):317-325.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.123
  13. Comparison of Unaided and Aided Visual Acuity in Adults With Down Syndrome. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2025 Jan 02; 14(1):30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  14. Visual Acuity Prediction Based on Different Refraction Types For Patients With Down Syndrome. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2023 09 01; 12(9):11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  15. Dioptric differences between clinically determined and metric-optimised refractions for adults with Down syndrome. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2023 09; 43(5):1016-1028.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  16. Visual Acuity Outcomes in a Randomized Trial of Wavefront Metric-optimized Refractions in Adults with Down Syndrome. Optom Vis Sci. 2022 01 01; 99(1):58-66.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  17. Modeling refractive correction strategies in keratoconus. J Vis. 2021 09 01; 21(10):18.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  18. Greater higher order aberrations induced by toric orthokeratology versus soft toric multifocal contact lens wear. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2021 07; 41(4):726-735.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  19. Change in visual acuity is well correlated with change in image-quality metrics for both normal and keratoconic wavefront errors. J Vis. 2013 Nov 26; 13(13):28.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  20. A population study on changes in wave aberrations with accommodation. J Vis. 2004 Apr 16; 4(4):272-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.