Jason Marsack to Refractive Errors
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Jason Marsack has written about Refractive Errors.
Connection Strength
3.034
-
Variability in Objective Refraction for Persons with Down Syndrome. Optom Vis Sci. 2017 05; 94(5):574-581.
Score: 0.511
-
Template-based correction of high-order aberration in keratoconus. Optom Vis Sci. 2013 Apr; 90(4):324-34.
Score: 0.385
-
Uncorrected wavefront error and visual performance during RGP wear in keratoconus. Optom Vis Sci. 2007 Jun; 84(6):463-70.
Score: 0.257
-
Impact of Zernike-fit error on simulated high- and low-contrast acuity in keratoconus: implications for using Zernike-based corrections. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2006 Apr; 23(4):769-76.
Score: 0.237
-
Comparison of Unaided and Aided Visual Acuity in Adults With Down Syndrome. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2025 Jan 02; 14(1):30.
Score: 0.217
-
Metrics of optical quality derived from wave aberrations predict visual performance. J Vis. 2004 Apr 23; 4(4):322-8.
Score: 0.207
-
Dioptric differences between clinically determined and metric-optimised refractions for adults with Down syndrome. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2023 09; 43(5):1016-1028.
Score: 0.194
-
Visual Acuity Outcomes in a Randomized Trial of Wavefront Metric-optimized Refractions in Adults with Down Syndrome. Optom Vis Sci. 2022 01 01; 99(1):58-66.
Score: 0.177
-
A Randomized Trial of Objective Spectacle Prescriptions for Adults with Down Syndrome: Baseline Data and Methods. Optom Vis Sci. 2021 01 01; 98(1):88-99.
Score: 0.165
-
Evaluating the use of a temperature sensor to monitor spectacle compliance in warm versus cold climates. Clin Exp Optom. 2019 03; 102(2):147-153.
Score: 0.141
-
Objective measurement of spectacle wear with a temperature sensor data logger. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018 01; 38(1):37-47.
Score: 0.132
-
Comparison of Whole Eye versus First-Surface Astigmatism in Down Syndrome. Optom Vis Sci. 2015 Jul; 92(7):804-14.
Score: 0.112
-
Detecting significant change in wavefront error: how long does it take? Clin Exp Optom. 2009 May; 92(3):246-52.
Score: 0.073
-
Controlled induction of spherical aberration with custom soft contact lenses. Clin Exp Optom. 2009 May; 92(3):283-8.
Score: 0.073
-
Performance of wavefront-guided soft lenses in three keratoconus subjects. Optom Vis Sci. 2008 Dec; 85(12):E1172-8.
Score: 0.071
-
A population study on changes in wave aberrations with accommodation. J Vis. 2004 Apr 16; 4(4):272-80.
Score: 0.052
-
Complications and fitting challenges associated with scleral contact lenses: A review. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2016 Apr; 39(2):88-96.
Score: 0.028