Header Logo

Connection

Jason Marsack to Humans

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Jason Marsack has written about Humans.
Jason Marsack
Connection Strength
1.512
Humans
  1. Utilising a visual image quality metric to optimise spectacle prescriptions for eyes with keratoconus. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2023 09; 43(5):1007-1015.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.083
  2. Clinical applications of personalising the neural components of visual image quality metrics for individual eyes. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2022 03; 42(2):272-282.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.075
  3. Comparing the CamBlobs2 contrast sensitivity test to the near Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity test in normally-sighted young adults. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2021 09; 41(5):1125-1133.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.073
  4. Orientation-specific long-term neural adaptation of the visual system in keratoconus. Vision Res. 2021 01; 178:100-111.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.070
  5. Quantifying the Optical and Physical Consequences of Daily Cleaning on Conventional and Wavefront-guided Scleral Lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2020 09; 97(9):754-760.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  6. Case Report: What Are We Doing for Our "20/20 Unhappy" Scleral Lens Patients? Optom Vis Sci. 2020 09; 97(9):826-830.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  7. The Impact of Misaligned Wavefront-guided Correction in a Scleral Lens for the Highly Aberrated Eye. Optom Vis Sci. 2020 09; 97(9):732-740.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  8. Visual interaction of 2nd to 5th order Zernike aberration terms with vertical coma. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2020 09; 40(5):669-679.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.068
  9. Alignment of a wavefront-guided scleral lens correction in the presence of a lens capsulotomy. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2020 12; 43(6):613-616.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.066
  10. Do Polymer Coatings Change the Aberrations of Conventional and Wavefront-guided Scleral Lenses? Optom Vis Sci. 2020 01; 97(1):28-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.066
  11. Application of Topographical Keratoconus Detection Metrics to Eyes of Individuals with Down Syndrome. Optom Vis Sci. 2019 09; 96(9):664-669.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.064
  12. Comparison of Wavefront-guided and Best Conventional Scleral Lenses after Habituation in Eyes with Corneal Ectasia. Optom Vis Sci. 2019 04; 96(4):238-247.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  13. Variability in Objective Refraction for Persons with Down Syndrome. Optom Vis Sci. 2017 05; 94(5):574-581.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  14. Wavefront-guided scleral lens correction in keratoconus. Optom Vis Sci. 2014 Oct; 91(10):1221-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  15. Template-based correction of high-order aberration in keratoconus. Optom Vis Sci. 2013 Apr; 90(4):324-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  16. Performance of wavefront-guided soft lenses in three keratoconus subjects. Optom Vis Sci. 2008 Dec; 85(12):E1172-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  17. On-eye performance of custom wavefront-guided soft contact lenses in a habitual soft lens-wearing keratoconic patient. J Refract Surg. 2007 Nov; 23(9):960-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  18. Uncorrected wavefront error and visual performance during RGP wear in keratoconus. Optom Vis Sci. 2007 Jun; 84(6):463-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  19. Impact of Zernike-fit error on simulated high- and low-contrast acuity in keratoconus: implications for using Zernike-based corrections. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2006 Apr; 23(4):769-76.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  20. Comparison of Unaided and Aided Visual Acuity in Adults With Down Syndrome. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2025 Jan 02; 14(1):30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  21. Metrics of optical quality derived from wave aberrations predict visual performance. J Vis. 2004 Apr 23; 4(4):322-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  22. Visual Acuity Prediction Based on Different Refraction Types For Patients With Down Syndrome. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2023 09 01; 12(9):11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  23. Dioptric differences between clinically determined and metric-optimised refractions for adults with Down syndrome. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2023 09; 43(5):1016-1028.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  24. Case Report: When Two Is Worse Than One-Stereo Imbalance in a Case of Wavefront-guided Scleral Lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2023 05 01; 100(5):299-303.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  25. Visual Acuity Outcomes in a Randomized Trial of Wavefront Metric-optimized Refractions in Adults with Down Syndrome. Optom Vis Sci. 2022 01 01; 99(1):58-66.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  26. Modeling refractive correction strategies in keratoconus. J Vis. 2021 09 01; 21(10):18.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  27. Avoiding penetrating keratoplasty in severe keratoconus using a wavefront-guided scleral lens. Clin Exp Optom. 2022 01; 105(1):86-88.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  28. Greater higher order aberrations induced by toric orthokeratology versus soft toric multifocal contact lens wear. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2021 07; 41(4):726-735.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  29. A Randomized Trial of Objective Spectacle Prescriptions for Adults with Down Syndrome: Baseline Data and Methods. Optom Vis Sci. 2021 01 01; 98(1):88-99.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  30. Understanding the Impact of Individual Perceived Image Quality Features on Visual Performance. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2020 04; 9(5):7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  31. A measure of tear inflow in habitual scleral lens wearers with and without midday fogging. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2019 02; 42(1):36-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  32. Evaluating the use of a temperature sensor to monitor spectacle compliance in warm versus cold climates. Clin Exp Optom. 2019 03; 102(2):147-153.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  33. Repeatability of Monocular Acuity Testing in Adults with and without Down Syndrome. Optom Vis Sci. 2018 03; 95(3):202-211.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  34. Objective measurement of spectacle wear with a temperature sensor data logger. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018 01; 38(1):37-47.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  35. Is an objective refraction optimised using the visual Strehl ratio better than a subjective refraction? Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2017 05; 37(3):317-325.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  36. Simulated Keratometry Repeatability in Subjects with and without Down Syndrome. Optom Vis Sci. 2016 11; 93(11):1356-1363.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  37. A Comparison of Three Methods to Increase Scleral Contact Lens On-Eye Stability. Eye Contact Lens. 2015 Nov; 41(6):386-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  38. Complications and fitting challenges associated with scleral contact lenses: A review. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2016 Apr; 39(2):88-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  39. Comparison of Whole Eye versus First-Surface Astigmatism in Down Syndrome. Optom Vis Sci. 2015 Jul; 92(7):804-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  40. Change in visual acuity is well correlated with change in image-quality metrics for both normal and keratoconic wavefront errors. J Vis. 2013 Nov 26; 13(13):28.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  41. Optimizing wavefront-guided corrections for highly aberrated eyes in the presence of registration uncertainty. J Vis. 2013 Jun 11; 13(7).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  42. Noise in wavefront error measurement from pupil center location uncertainty. J Refract Surg. 2010 Oct; 26(10):796-802.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  43. Detecting significant change in wavefront error: how long does it take? Clin Exp Optom. 2009 May; 92(3):246-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  44. Controlled induction of spherical aberration with custom soft contact lenses. Clin Exp Optom. 2009 May; 92(3):283-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  45. Dynamic simulation of the effect of soft toric contact lenses movement on retinal image quality. Optom Vis Sci. 2008 Apr; 85(4):230-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  46. Three-dimensional relationship between high-order root-mean-square wavefront error, pupil diameter, and aging. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2007 Mar; 24(3):578-87.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  47. Metrics of retinal image quality predict visual performance in eyes with 20/17 or better visual acuity. Optom Vis Sci. 2006 Sep; 83(9):635-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  48. Measuring visual acuity--mesopic or photopic conditions, and high or low contrast letters? J Refract Surg. 2004 Sep-Oct; 20(5):S508-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  49. Quantifying scatter in Shack-Hartmann images to evaluate nuclear cataract. J Refract Surg. 2004 Sep-Oct; 20(5):S515-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  50. A population study on changes in wave aberrations with accommodation. J Vis. 2004 Apr 16; 4(4):272-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  51. Interaction between aberrations to improve or reduce visual performance. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003 Aug; 29(8):1487-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.