Header Logo

Connection

Jason Marsack to Middle Aged

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Jason Marsack has written about Middle Aged.
Jason Marsack
Connection Strength
0.684
Middle Aged
  1. Application of Topographical Keratoconus Detection Metrics to Eyes of Individuals with Down Syndrome. Optom Vis Sci. 2019 09; 96(9):664-669.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.115
  2. Comparison of Wavefront-guided and Best Conventional Scleral Lenses after Habituation in Eyes with Corneal Ectasia. Optom Vis Sci. 2019 04; 96(4):238-247.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.111
  3. Variability in Objective Refraction for Persons with Down Syndrome. Optom Vis Sci. 2017 05; 94(5):574-581.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.097
  4. Uncorrected wavefront error and visual performance during RGP wear in keratoconus. Optom Vis Sci. 2007 Jun; 84(6):463-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  5. Comparison of Unaided and Aided Visual Acuity in Adults With Down Syndrome. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2025 Jan 02; 14(1):30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  6. Case Report: When Two Is Worse Than One-Stereo Imbalance in a Case of Wavefront-guided Scleral Lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2023 05 01; 100(5):299-303.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  7. A Randomized Trial of Objective Spectacle Prescriptions for Adults with Down Syndrome: Baseline Data and Methods. Optom Vis Sci. 2021 01 01; 98(1):88-99.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  8. A measure of tear inflow in habitual scleral lens wearers with and without midday fogging. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2019 02; 42(1):36-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  9. Repeatability of Monocular Acuity Testing in Adults with and without Down Syndrome. Optom Vis Sci. 2018 03; 95(3):202-211.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  10. Simulated Keratometry Repeatability in Subjects with and without Down Syndrome. Optom Vis Sci. 2016 11; 93(11):1356-1363.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  11. A Comparison of Three Methods to Increase Scleral Contact Lens On-Eye Stability. Eye Contact Lens. 2015 Nov; 41(6):386-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  12. Comparison of Whole Eye versus First-Surface Astigmatism in Down Syndrome. Optom Vis Sci. 2015 Jul; 92(7):804-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  13. Noise in wavefront error measurement from pupil center location uncertainty. J Refract Surg. 2010 Oct; 26(10):796-802.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  14. Detecting significant change in wavefront error: how long does it take? Clin Exp Optom. 2009 May; 92(3):246-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  15. Three-dimensional relationship between high-order root-mean-square wavefront error, pupil diameter, and aging. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2007 Mar; 24(3):578-87.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  16. Metrics of retinal image quality predict visual performance in eyes with 20/17 or better visual acuity. Optom Vis Sci. 2006 Sep; 83(9):635-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  17. Measuring visual acuity--mesopic or photopic conditions, and high or low contrast letters? J Refract Surg. 2004 Sep-Oct; 20(5):S508-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  18. Quantifying scatter in Shack-Hartmann images to evaluate nuclear cataract. J Refract Surg. 2004 Sep-Oct; 20(5):S515-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  19. Interaction between aberrations to improve or reduce visual performance. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003 Aug; 29(8):1487-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.