Header Logo

Connection

Co-Authors

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by Jason Marsack and Raymond Applegate.
Jason Marsack
Connection Strength
5.358
Raymond Applegate
  1. Wavefront-guided scleral lens correction in keratoconus. Optom Vis Sci. 2014 Oct; 91(10):1221-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.483
  2. Template-based correction of high-order aberration in keratoconus. Optom Vis Sci. 2013 Apr; 90(4):324-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.435
  3. Performance of wavefront-guided soft lenses in three keratoconus subjects. Optom Vis Sci. 2008 Dec; 85(12):E1172-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.322
  4. On-eye performance of custom wavefront-guided soft contact lenses in a habitual soft lens-wearing keratoconic patient. J Refract Surg. 2007 Nov; 23(9):960-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.299
  5. Uncorrected wavefront error and visual performance during RGP wear in keratoconus. Optom Vis Sci. 2007 Jun; 84(6):463-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.290
  6. Impact of Zernike-fit error on simulated high- and low-contrast acuity in keratoconus: implications for using Zernike-based corrections. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2006 Apr; 23(4):769-76.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.268
  7. Metrics of optical quality derived from wave aberrations predict visual performance. J Vis. 2004 Apr 23; 4(4):322-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.234
  8. Utilising a visual image quality metric to optimise spectacle prescriptions for eyes with keratoconus. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2023 09; 43(5):1007-1015.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.220
  9. Clinical applications of personalising the neural components of visual image quality metrics for individual eyes. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2022 03; 42(2):272-282.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.200
  10. Modeling refractive correction strategies in keratoconus. J Vis. 2021 09 01; 21(10):18.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.195
  11. Avoiding penetrating keratoplasty in severe keratoconus using a wavefront-guided scleral lens. Clin Exp Optom. 2022 01; 105(1):86-88.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.193
  12. Orientation-specific long-term neural adaptation of the visual system in keratoconus. Vision Res. 2021 01; 178:100-111.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.184
  13. Case Report: What Are We Doing for Our "20/20 Unhappy" Scleral Lens Patients? Optom Vis Sci. 2020 09; 97(9):826-830.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.182
  14. The Impact of Misaligned Wavefront-guided Correction in a Scleral Lens for the Highly Aberrated Eye. Optom Vis Sci. 2020 09; 97(9):732-740.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.182
  15. Alignment of a wavefront-guided scleral lens correction in the presence of a lens capsulotomy. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2020 12; 43(6):613-616.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.176
  16. Do Polymer Coatings Change the Aberrations of Conventional and Wavefront-guided Scleral Lenses? Optom Vis Sci. 2020 01; 97(1):28-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.174
  17. Comparison of Wavefront-guided and Best Conventional Scleral Lenses after Habituation in Eyes with Corneal Ectasia. Optom Vis Sci. 2019 04; 96(4):238-247.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.165
  18. Is an objective refraction optimised using the visual Strehl ratio better than a subjective refraction? Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2017 05; 37(3):317-325.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.144
  19. A Comparison of Three Methods to Increase Scleral Contact Lens On-Eye Stability. Eye Contact Lens. 2015 Nov; 41(6):386-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.130
  20. Change in visual acuity is well correlated with change in image-quality metrics for both normal and keratoconic wavefront errors. J Vis. 2013 Nov 26; 13(13):28.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.114
  21. Optimizing wavefront-guided corrections for highly aberrated eyes in the presence of registration uncertainty. J Vis. 2013 Jun 11; 13(7).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.110
  22. Noise in wavefront error measurement from pupil center location uncertainty. J Refract Surg. 2010 Oct; 26(10):796-802.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.092
  23. Controlled induction of spherical aberration with custom soft contact lenses. Clin Exp Optom. 2009 May; 92(3):283-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.082
  24. Dynamic simulation of the effect of soft toric contact lenses movement on retinal image quality. Optom Vis Sci. 2008 Apr; 85(4):230-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.077
  25. Three-dimensional relationship between high-order root-mean-square wavefront error, pupil diameter, and aging. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2007 Mar; 24(3):578-87.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.071
  26. Metrics of retinal image quality predict visual performance in eyes with 20/17 or better visual acuity. Optom Vis Sci. 2006 Sep; 83(9):635-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  27. Measuring visual acuity--mesopic or photopic conditions, and high or low contrast letters? J Refract Surg. 2004 Sep-Oct; 20(5):S508-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.060
  28. Quantifying scatter in Shack-Hartmann images to evaluate nuclear cataract. J Refract Surg. 2004 Sep-Oct; 20(5):S515-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.060
  29. Interaction between aberrations to improve or reduce visual performance. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003 Aug; 29(8):1487-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  30. Case Report: When Two Is Worse Than One-Stereo Imbalance in a Case of Wavefront-guided Scleral Lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2023 05 01; 100(5):299-303.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  31. Detecting significant change in wavefront error: how long does it take? Clin Exp Optom. 2009 May; 92(3):246-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  32. A population study on changes in wave aberrations with accommodation. J Vis. 2004 Apr 16; 4(4):272-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.